![]() We cannot expect new stable states that will endure for our own lifetimes. The loss of the stable state means that our society and all of its institutions are in continuous processes of transformation. ![]() He provided a theoretical framework linking the experience of living in a situation of an increasing change with the need for learning. Perhaps the defining contribution here was made by Donald Schon. The emergence of the idea of the ‘learning organization’ is wrapped up with notions such as ‘ the learning society’. The learning society and the knowledge economy We finish with a brief exploration of the contribution of social capital to the functioning of organizations. On this page we examine the path-breaking work of Donald Schon on firms as learning systems and then go on to explore Peter Senge’s deeply influential treatment of the learning organization (and it’s focus on systemic thinking and dialogue). We could argue that organizational learning is the ‘ activity and the process by which organizations eventually reach th ideal of a learning organization’ (Finger and Brand 1999: 136). (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999: 2 see also Tsang 1997). The literature on organizational learning has concentrated on the detached collection and analysis of the processes involved in individual and collective learning inside organizations whereas the learning organizations literature has an action orientation, and is geared toward using specific diagnostic and evaluative methodological tools which can help to identify, promote and evaluate the quality of learning processes inside organizations. Moreover, since the central concerns have been somewhat different, the two literatures have developed along divergent tracks. Here there is a distinct contrast with the study of organizational learning.Īlthough theorists of learning organizations have often drawn on ideas from organizational learning, there has been little traffic in the reverse direction. Second, the focus on creating a template and upon the need to present it in a form that is commercially attractive to the consultants and writers has led to a significant under-powering of the theoretical framework for the learning organization. This might be because the vision is ‘too ideal’ or because it isn’t relevant to the requirements and dynamics of organizations. First, while there has been a lot of talk about learning organizations it is very difficult to identify real-life examples. It is characterized by a recognition that ‘individual and collective learning are key’ ( op. In this sense the learning organization is an ideal, ‘towards which organizations have to evolve in order to be able to respond to the various pressures (Finger and Brand 1999: 136). Writers have sought to identify templates, or ideal forms, ‘which real organizations could attempt to emulate’ (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999: 2). Many consultants and organizations have recognized the commercial significance of organizational learning – and the notion of the ‘learning organization’ has been a central orienting point in this. peter senge and the learning organization.systems theory and the learning organization Īssociated pages: donald schön and the learning society.the learning society and the knowledge economy.Is it anything more than rhetoric? Can it be realized? We explore some of the themes that have emerged in the literature and the contributions of key thinkers like Donald Schon and Peter Senge. Just what constitutes a ‘learning organization is a matter of some debate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |